I agree with your concluding remarks that urge for depth and refinement of individual processing despite the cognitive limitations I suppose. One point which I am personally very indecisive about is how to adopt a certain comfortable zone as these conversations and expressions ( specific example being the ssr topic ) continue as they are . Crossing journalism boundaries for example — can we just let them continue as they are without any protest ?.. may be this is a much needed experiment and as you also say ‘ pending conversation’. But I cant seem to find clarity on that should the chaos be held gently with its corruption ( at least from what it seems) or evil( as it seems ) disorder be questioned. Should we just be meditative inward processing citizens or should we call out the nonsense ( as it seems) of the Arnabs. Is the question.